As you won't read on the institutionally anti Israel BBC...
Saturday, 22 July 2017
BBC corrects misleading Jerusalem terror headline after outrage from Israel, Jewish organizations per World Jewish Congress
'In a statement explaining the retraction of its original headline, the BBC said that it accepted that it "did not appropriately reflect the nature of the events" and that while "there was no intention to mislead our audiences, we regret any offense caused."
Israeli Ambassador to the UK, Yuval Rotem, tweeted following the retraction: "@BBCWorld admits mistake, but such mistakes happen way too often. #BBC consumers beware."'
Institutional anti Israel propaganda all over the BBC.
Egyptian Islamic scholar Sheikh Ayman Khamis said that Al-Andalus was "occupied by the Spaniards just like Palestine is occupied by the Jews, and we shall take it back, Allah willing." He was speaking on Mekameleen TV, a Turkey-based Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood channel, on June 11.
Ayman Khamis: "Al-Alndalus is just like Palestine. We shall never forget our lands. We say to the West: We shall never forget our lands. We shall take it back from you because it is occupied land. Al-Andalus is occupied by the Spaniards, just like Palestine is occupied by the Jews, and we shall take it back, Allah willing."
I've reported previously that there are plenty of Islamists who openly state what their aims are for the West but that the European governments and the likes of the BBC just ignore these statemnets for fear of having to acknowledge the sheer horror of the situation that we are in.
This piece of shit article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-40685369 by the institutionally anti Israel BBC contains the usual fake equivalence figures and narrative that I've covered too many times now. I really cannot be bothered to analyse such crap any more. Until the BBC release the Balen Report let's just accept that the BBC is institutionally anti Israel and move on.
This particular BBC report ends by linking to a piece 'Is Palestinian-Israeli violence being driven by social media?' I'd say that the Palestinian Israeli violence is being driven by Islam's hatred of Jews and by the majority of the world's media, especially the BBC, spewing out anti Israel propaganda masquerading as news. The BBC and other media have Jewish Israeli blood on their hands and should be held to account.
Friday, 21 July 2017
Kemi Badenoch with a good speech. Much to admire and agree with there. Somehow I doubt that the institutionally pro Labour Party BBC will be featuring this bright, black female MP on their airwaves. She really doesn't adhere to the BBC / Labour Party narrative.
Thanks to Guido Fawkes for the spot https://order-order.com/2017/07/21/best-maiden-speech-2017-intake/
What the BBC don't tell you about the British woman who says she is being forced to go to court to get an apology after she was questioned by counter-terrorism police for reading a Syrian art book on a plane
'A British woman says she is being forced to go to court to get an apology after she was questioned by counter-terrorism police for reading a Syrian art book on a plane.
Faizah Shaheen was reported to authorities by Thomson cabin crew on a honeymoon flight to Turkey in 2016.
Her lawyers told the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme she believes she was singled out because of her race.
Thomson said its crew were "trained to report any concerns" as a precaution.
Ms Shaheen - a Muslim, whose work in mental health care in part involves looking for the signs of radicalisation in young people - was reading Syria Speaks: Art and Culture from the Frontline on the outbound flight.
The book is a collection of literature, photos, songs and cartoons from Syrian artists and writers.
She was stopped by police when she returned to the UK two weeks later.'
Oddly the BBC haven't shown any images from that book, here's a couple:
I wonder why these images might cause a member of aircrew some concern.
I wonder why the BBC choose not to show these images, is context unimportant?
This story is fascinating but will not be reported upon by the Obama worshipping BBC.
Thursday, 20 July 2017
Fascinating stuff and completely not reportable by the institutionally anti President Donald Trump and pro Hillary Clinton BBC and CNN.
HA Goodman on the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, what happened to the money raised and what happened to Klaus Eberwein
It's odd how HA Goodman can ask about the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, what happened to the money raised and what happened to Klaus Eberwein, but CNN and the BBC have no interest at all. Why might that be?
Chronic grade inflation?
'The proportion of top degree grades being awarded by UK universities has soared - with some universities giving first-class degrees to more than a third of their students.
The University of Surrey awarded a first-class degree to 41% of students last year, more than doubling the proportion five years ago.
And firsts awarded at the University of East Anglia have almost trebled to 37%.
Professor of education Alan Smithers called it "chronic grade inflation".'
More dumbed down courses and grade inflation all over the UK's educational system, along with socialist brainwashing.
Wednesday, 19 July 2017
Labour's promise on student debt was just a ruse to get student votes - No Shit Sherlock
Ever get the feeling you've been had?
News that never features on the pro Hillary Clinton BBC.
'Hillary Clinton sought to tamp down reports about her opposition to Russia sanctions that coincided with a speech her husband gave in Moscow that landed him half a million dollars.
Hillary Clinton opposed Russia sanctions in 2010 when her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was paid to give a speech at the Russian bank Renaissance Capital, Fox News reports.
The bank was connected to the fraud case that led to the sanctions posed by the Magnitsky Act, and after the former president gave the speech, Russian President Vladimir Putin called him to say thanks.
This story did not receive much attention while President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were pursuing their Russian "reset," but Hillary Clinton's campaign took pains to prevent the story of Bill's speech from getting out. In 2015, campaign operatives were able to prevent a mainstream media outlet from reporting on it."With the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC's opposition to the Magnitsky bill a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow," Jesse Lehrich, who was part of Hillary For America's Rapid Response Communications team, said on May 21, 2015.
The memo was released by WikiLeaks, with "HRC" and "WJC" referring to Hillary and Bill Clinton respectively.'
More here http://freebeacon.com/politics/bill-clinton-paid-500000-speak-russia-hillary-opposed-state-dept-sanctions/ but definitely not on the BBC or CNN.
Oddly no reporting of this death on the pro Hillary Clinton BBC. What really happened to Klaus Eberwein?
The BBC report through gritted teeth http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40644850
'The gap between the richest and poorest households in the UK has narrowed since the recession of 2007-08, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
In its latest report on living standards, the IFS said rising employment and sharp falls in income in the middle and top earning households was behind the decline in inequality.
There had been a "dramatic" fall in inequality in London, the IFS said.'
Oh dear, that very counter the BBC/Labour Party narrative.
I expect they'll get their best minds onto how to put this report into context, giving prominence to a Labour Party spokesperson will be a priority.
''All we know about them is that they served the religion of Allah faithfully,' says Umm el-Fahm preacher.
Hundreds gathered in an Umm el-Fahm cemetery Sunday evening as the three terrorists responsible for Friday's deadly terror attack near the Temple Mount were buried. The three terrorists, all of whom were residents of Umm el-Fahm, were praised at a special memorial ceremony held at the local mosque they attended,.. '
More here https://israelnewsonline.org/israeli-arab-mosque-honors-temple-mount-terrorists but definitely not on the institutionally anti Israel BBC who barely reported the original murderous terrorist attack and have no interest in letting the British public see the Palestinians for what they really are.
Tuesday, 18 July 2017
Views that the institutionally anti President Donald Trump BBC would never allow airspace
"Against the advice of security hawks"
Surely this is the intent that James Comey couldn't find. If so then Hillary Clinton needs to be charged under the Espionage Act.
Saudi Arabia investigates video of woman in miniskirt - BBC News manage to report some of Saudi Arabia's anti women laws but by no means all
'Women in Saudi Arabia must wear loose-fitting, full-length robes known as "abayas" in public, as well as a headscarf. They are also banned from driving and are separated from unrelated men.'
That's all of the anti women laws in Saudi Arabia that the BBC manage to report. Are there really no others?
BBC report here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-40633687
Monday, 17 July 2017
Lauren Southen there reporting from Paris which is more than the institutionally pro Islamic immigration BBC will do.
Guido Fawkes reports:
'Today John McDonnell u-turned on that key election promise which won the votes of so many students and young people, telling Marr it was just "an ambition" and conceding for the first time "it's very difficult" to do.
All those who voted Labour to have their debts written off should watch this interview. It was fantasy politics, a pack of lies all along…'
More here https://order-order.com/2017/07/16/mcdonnell-backtracks-on-labour-vow-to-write-off-student-debt/ but not on the BBC where getting the Labour Party into power is far more important than reporting the truth about them and their policies.
Sunday, 16 July 2017
Another Clinton related death, the coincidences just keep on coming and the corpses keep on piling up. Not that the MSM ever report on such news.
It's that time of year, Gaza kindergarten graduation display time.
'In a graduation ceremony at the Al-Hoda Islamic Kindergarten in Gaza, pre-schoolers, wearing uniforms and carrying mock guns and posters of Islamic Jihad leaders, staged a display of terror attacks against Israelis. The footage, which was posted on the kindergarten's YouTube channel on May 29, includes Hebrew lyrics threatening Israelis with missiles and terror attacks and mocking IDF soldier Oron Shaul, whose body has been held by Hamas since 2014.'
For similar displays, see https://www.memri.org/tv/terror-show-gaza-kindergarten-graduation-ceremony-islamic-jihad-leader-israelis-we-are-not and https://www.memri.org/tv/pre-schoolers-toy-guns-parade-west-bank-kindergarten-graduation-ceremony. The ceremony is held annually at the Al-Hoda kindergarten, which is affiliated with the Islamic Jihad. Omar Fora, the head of the kindergarten association and a leader of the Islamic Jihad, delivered an address, and Islamic cleric Taher Al-Lulu slammed Saudi Arabia for "standing behind Israel and America."
Thanks to MEMRI for sourcing and reporting this.
Saturday, 15 July 2017
That video is of an address at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem, by the Palestinian cleric Sheikh Nadhal Siam, also known as "Abu Ibrahim". He criticized the Saudi and Qatari regimes, which, he said, were "immersed in collaboration" with the Americans and the English, respectively. His prayers to Allah to "enable us to slaughter" the Americans, the Europeans and the "criminal and treacherous" Arab rulers were answered by cries of "Amen" from his audience.
His words which I quote below are the sort of hate-speech by Palestinian and other Islamist clerics that the BBC and other pro-Palestinian media just don't quote, preferring to propagandise on the Palestinians behalf that they are peace-loving people oppressed by the Zionist entity.
'"Do not think that some of the collaborators are right and some are wrong. They are all equally collaborators. Just as the Saudi regime is a lackey of the Americans, and is immersed in collaboration with them, the Qatari regime is a lackey of the English, and is immersed in collaboration with them. All these [regimes] are like riding beasts ridden by the superpowers.
"Oh Allah, enable us to slaughter the Americans!"
Nadhal Siam: "And the Europeans!"
Nadhal Siam: "And our criminal and treacherous [Arab] rulers!"
Nadhal Siam: "Oh Allah, bring about their downfall soon!"
Nadhal Siam: "Oh Allah, do not leave a single one of them on the face of the earth!"
Nadhal Siam: "Oh Allah, bring about their downfall and their annihilation soon!"
Nadhal Siam: "Oh Allah, replace them with the Emir of the Believers!"
When he calls for the "slaughter of the Americans" and "Europeans", and his audience say Amen, do understand what they mean...
Friday, 14 July 2017
'Two Ukrainian tourists, reported to be women, have been killed in mass stabbings at a hotel in the popular Red Sea resort of Hurghada, Egyptian medical officials say.
At least four other people were injured and a man has been arrested.The suspect is being questioned by police to determine his motives, the interior ministry said.
The attacker appears to have swum from a nearby public beach to gain access to the resort, officials say.'
The BBC are desperately hoping that this wasn't an attack by Islamist(s). We'll see...
I've Worked with Refugees for Decades. Europe's Afghan Crime Wave Is Mind-Boggling. Per The National Interest
This article by someone who's worked with immigrants for many years http://nationalinterest.org/feature/ive-worked-refugees-decades-europes-afghan-crime-wave-mind-21506 is profoundly depressing. Here's an extract but do read the whole piece:
'This brings us to a third, more compelling and quite disturbing theory—the one that my Afghan friend, the court translator, puts forward. On the basis of his hundreds of interactions with these young men in his professional capacity over the past several years, he believes to have discovered that they are motivated by a deep and abiding contempt for Western civilization. To them, Europeans are the enemy, and their women are legitimate spoils, as are all the other things one can take from them: housing, money, passports. Their laws don't matter, their culture is uninteresting and, ultimately, their civilization is going to fall anyway to the horde of which one is the spearhead. No need to assimilate, or work hard, or try to build a decent life here for yourself—these Europeans are too soft to seriously punish you for a transgression, and their days are numbered.
And it's not just the sex crimes, my friend notes. Those may agitate public sentiment the most, but the deliberate, insidious abuse of the welfare system is just as consequential. Afghan refugees, he says, have a particular proclivity to play the system: to lie about their age, to lie about their circumstances, to pretend to be younger, to be handicapped, to belong to an ethnic minority when even the tired eye of an Austrian judge can distinguish the delicate features of a Hazara from those of a Pashtun.
I see his point. In the course of my research, I encountered thirty-year-olds with family in Austria who were passing themselves off as "unaccompanied minors." I met people misrepresenting an old traffic injury as proof that they had been tortured. I learned of an Afghan family that had emigrated to Hungary two decades ago. The children were born there and attended Hungarian schools. When the refugee crisis erupted, enticed by news of all the associated benefits, this family decided to take on a new identity and make their way to Sweden on the pretense of being brand-new refugees. Claiming to have lost their papers during their "flight," they registered under new assumed names and reduced the ages of their children; the mother declared herself a widow. Now ensconced in comfortable free housing along with their hale, hearty and very much alive father—whom they pass off as an uncle—with a monthly welfare check, they are smug parasites leeching off the gullibility of Sweden's taxpayers.'
Do read the whole piece to learn about the types of attacks and the way that these 'refugees' game Europe's legal systems to ensure that they can never be deported away from their European benefits.
A unbiased, unobsessed by promoting immigration especially from the Muslim world BBC would report this sort of article but that isn't what the BBC is.
There's one passage in this Breitbart report http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/07/13/four-thousand-african-migrants-picked-up-off-libyan-coast-shuttled-to-italy/ on immigration from Africa into Italy that caught my eye :
'Based on statements received at the time of landing in Italy, the 2017 migrants home countries are Nigeria (14,504), Bangladesh (8,268), Guinea (7,844), Ivory Coast (7,455), Gambia (5,022), Senegal (4,914), Mali (4,862), Eritrea (4,553), Morocco (4,190) and Sudan (4,051).'
The African countries are not all war torn but what's that country from where the second highest number of immigrants came? Bangladesh? Poor yes, but not war torn.
Somehow I doubt that the institutionally pro unlimited immigration BBC will choose to report such inconvenient numbers, that might let the cat out of the bag.
Thursday, 13 July 2017
This JNS article http://www.jns.org/latest-articles/2017/7/5/new-study-reveals-europes-rising-anti-semitism-forces-jews-to-leave-or-hide re a University of Oslo study will get no BBC coverage because disproportionately the perpetrators of the wave of antisemitism in Europe are not of the far right but Muslims.
'Who is responsible for the attacks on Jews? In every country studied, except for Russia, the perpetrators are disproportionately of Muslim backgrounds. A British study cited in the University of Oslo report notes that the proportion of Muslim perpetrators increases in the wake of "trigger events" in the Middle East.
In what might be considered a clumsy attempt to downplay anti-Semitism, German authorities do not classify anti-Israeli incidents as anti-Semitism. This results in absurdity. A Muslim firebombing of a synagogue can be classified as an anti-Israeli event, but not anti-Semitic. If any country should know better, it should be Germany. Is Kristallnacht going to be reinterpreted as not anti-Semitism, but a demonstration for racial purity? '
Now that's a truth far too inconvenient for the BBC to report.
You can watch the speech here at MEMRI
Thanks to MEMRI you can also read here
'Egyptian Cleric Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny Explains Enslavement of People Captured in Jihad: They All Become Booty (Archival)
In a lecture, Egyptian cleric Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny explained how the enslavement of people in countries conquered by Jihad is carried out. "In every war there is a winner and a loser," he said. "According to the rules of Islam, all the people in the [conquered] country become booty," and are "divided between the mujahideen," he said. Al-Heweny also talked about the benefits of slave markets, saying that they were useful if you needed a little spare cash.
Following are excerpts from the lecture, which was posted on the Internet on June 8, 2011.
Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny: ... there that according to the rulings of Jihad, if we fight polytheists… The Prophet Muhammad told the military commander that he should do three things: This hadith appears in the Muslim compilation. If you fight polytheist enemies, offer them three options: First, call them to join Islam. If they join Islam, let them be, because they will become just like you, and you won't fight Muslims. If they refuse to join Islam, they should pay the jizya poll tax. If they are willing to pay the jizya, take it from them and let them be. Okay so far?
If they refuse to pay the jizya, seek the help of Allah and fight them. These are the three options, which the Prophet Muhammad related to the military commander. In every war, there is a winner and there is a loser. If we win and invade the land of our infidel enemy… Jihad is a pure Islamic term. It is not a synonym for fighting, combat, struggle, or any other word. The basic prerequisite of Jihad is that your enemy be non-Muslim.
If we are the winners, it is only natural for us to impose the rules of Islam on the country we invaded. According to the rules of Islam, all the people in that country become booty and prisoners of war: the women, the men, the children, the money, the homes, the fields… All these become the property of the Islamic state.
What is the fate of the prisoners of war according to the shari'a? Since they constitute booty, they should be divided between the mujahideen. According to the hadith, the law states that anyone who did not participate in the raid does not get a share of the booty. This is well known. If you didn't participate in the Jihad, you don't get to share the booty. Let's say that we invaded a country with a population of half a million. What are we supposed to do with them?
We check how many mujahideen there were. Let's say there were 100,000. That's it, then. Each mujahid gets five of them. Each one gets five, but there can be a variety. You can take two men, two women, and a child, or the other way around. You divide them up. Great. As soon as this system is in place, there has to be a slave market, where can sell slaves, slavegirls, and children.
Each of these "heads" comes with a price. Let's say I am entitled to five "heads." I don't need any of them, but could use a little cash. Am I supposed to hang them just to get rid of them? No, you can sell them in the market. Well, in order for me to be able to sell them there has to be a market. Then the haggling begins: How much would you pay for this one? And for that one? The buyer says: 300. I say: No, let's make it 314. Eventually, he buys them. He takes them and leaves. Okay?
The way to repent for some sins is be removing the shackles from a slave's neck, setting him free. Where can I get a slave's neck, so I can get rid of my sins? I have to go and buy one. So, obviously, there has to be a slave market, where I can buy a slave's neck, and tell the slave that he is free for the sake of Allah.'
I am glad that Islam has the rules laid out for what happens after a successful war, we in the West can't say that we weren't warned. Although if you rely upon the BBC and our political masters you would be forgiven for not knowing this sort of information.
Now this is odd...
'The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump's inner circle was initially cleared into the United States by the Justice Department under "extraordinary circumstances" before she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president's eldest son, members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and Justice Department documents and interviews.
This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa.'
More here at Breitbart http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/12/hill-doj-let-russian-lawyer-us-met-trump-team/ but definitely not on the Hillary Clinton supporting CNN or BBC.
Fine analysis from Melanie Phillips:
'There is an urgent need to recalibrate the whole issue of the Arab war against Israel; to recalibrate it as one of war and victory; and to recalibrate it not just for the benefit of the Palestinians but also for the west and also for Israel.
We have to ask ourselves, surely, why do the Palestinians think the war is still on. Well, I think there are a number of reasons for that. One reason is that, unfortunately, if you are a religious Muslim you believe that any land conquered by Islam is then consecrated to Islam and nobody else can ever have sovereignty over it. So from that point of view there can be no victory over that kind of fanatical religious mindset.
But the main reason why the Palestinians think the war is still on is because they are encouraged to think that by the west. By Britain, by Europe and also by Israel's great ally and friend, America.
The Palestinian story has been accepted by the west to the extent that the west believes there is a Palestinian people which has a historic, national and legitimate claim to the land. There never was a Palestinian people, there is not, and it does not now have any legitimate claim to the land.
Even if it did have a claim to the land it would be forfeit because of nearly a century of exterminatory aggression. In every other conflict in the world, that sort of exterminatory aggression means that the aggressors are treated as pariahs. Uniquely in this conflict the aggressors have been treated over the best part of a century – because of their aggression – as statesmen-in-waiting.
It's not rocket science. If you treat aggressors as statesmen-in-waiting, you do not get peace and harmony. You get more aggression.
Now why has the west rewarded aggression in this way – uniquely – in this region? Many reasons. One is ignorance. One is malice. One is realpolitik – the desire to appease the Arabs over the oil weapon. Another is simply that people in the west believe – and I've heard this so many times – that there is no alternative.
But I would suggest there's a deeper problem here. The prevalent view in the west is that it no longer does war and victory. This is seen as uncivilised. War is seen as brutal, uncivilised and must never be undertaken. If the Palestinians or the Arabs or the developing world are waging war, well we "expect that of them", don't we, because they are basically "uncivilised" people. We in the west do not apparently expect them to accord with our own values of respect for human life, democracy and all the rest of it. In other words, the west has a deeply racist attitude towards the developing world.
And it believes in itself that it doesn't do war any more because war is uncivilised. Instead of war it does conflict resolution; it does law, not war.
And so as a result the war that's been taking place in this region by the Arabs against the Jewish homeland means that the west thinks that a compromise is essential. You have a war of extermination? Put the two sides in the same room, bang their heads together until they reach a compromise. Because both sides, according to this view, have a legitimate claim to the same piece of land.
In other words the west has, for nearly a century, mistaken this whole conflict as a fight over land boundaries whereas in fact it is a war of extermination. And where the west wants to press Israel to make compromise, every compromise Israel has ever made is seen by the Arabs as a sign of weakness and an incentive to further aggression.
In conclusion, I would say that the west's mistake – its conceptual, its fundamental mistake – perpetuates this conflict; indeed it is a signal reason, possibly the main reason, why this conflict got under way in the first place. in the 1930s, Britain responded to the pogroms being committed by the Arabs of this land against the returning Jews – and responded to the Arabs' violence against the then-ruling British under the Palestine Mandate – Britain responded to this aggression by saying to the Arabs: "Have part of the land which we have undertaken by solemn agreement under international treaty obligation to give to the Jews".
In other words, the original "two-state solution" was proposed in 1936 as a reward for exterminatory aggression and terror; and that continues to be the case today.
My final point is that the west needs to understand this – but, my goodness, Israel needs to understand that this narrative has to change. Israel is most reluctant to say to the free world, to the west, what it should be saying: "Are you crazy? Why do you treat this conflict differently from all other conflicts?" And until the west and until Israel actually understand that this conflict has to be reframed as one of war and victory, we're not going to get anywhere."'
There's more including the video of Melanie Phillips making the above points here http://www.melaniephillips.com/israel-won-now-get/ but obviously not on the institutionally anti Israel BBC.
Wednesday, 12 July 2017
Ofcom suspends Iman FM radio station for broadcasting 25 hours of lectures by Al-Qaeda leader including antisemitic hatred per Campaign Against Antisemitism
' The broadcasting regulator, the Office of Communications (Ofcom), has suspended Sheffield radio station, Iman FM, for broadcasting antisemitic and hate-filled speeches by Anwar Al-Awlaki, the "widely known terrorist leader and Al Qaeda recruiter."
In one speech broadcast by Iman FM, Al-Awlaki said that "Our problem is not with [Jews'] ethnicity but their mindset."
According to Ofcom's breach decision posted online: "Overall Ofcom considered the breaches in this case to be extremely serious and has today issued a Notice under section 111B Broadcasting Act 1990 suspending the Licence." According to the suspension notice, Iman FM has 21 days to provide an explanation for the broadcast before the station is shut down.
Iman FM confirmed to Ofcom that they had broadcast 25 hours worth of lectures by Al-Awlaki, claiming that they were "not aware of the background of the preacher and had no knowledge of him being proscribed by the United Nations." They added that "had this fact been known" they would not have broadcast the lectures and accepted the material breached the Broadcasting Code.'
More here https://antisemitism.uk/ofcom-suspends-iman-fm-radio-station-for-broadcasting-25-hours-of-lectures-by-al-qaeda-leader-including-antisemitic-hatred/ but likely not on the BBC.
Guido Fawkes reports on more BBC propagandising:
'On last night's BBC Six O'Clock News, Kamal Ahmed presented a package on the Taylor Report which included an interview with one Felicity Flynn. Flynn was introduced by name only and captioned as a "former zero hours worker". She had clearly been invited to Millbank studios to tape just a few seconds of her condemning "insecure work". Yet Felicity Flynn is not your average "former zero hours contract worker"…
She is in fact the Vice Chair of South Norwood Labour Party. She describes herself in her Twitter bio as a "socialist", and her social media is awash with pictures of her campaigning for Labour at the general election. Moreover, she's a rep for the PCS union, which might have been important to mention given the topic of the report. This came on the same day that the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme introduced a Corbynista union activist as a "Deliveroo rider", also in its Taylor Report coverage. This keeps happening. Either the Beeb is getting taken in by these hard-left agitators – which is incompetence – or they are complicit, which is worse…'
I'm of the opinion that the BBC aren't being tricked, they know what they are doing. The BBC acts as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party and for that reason is in breach of its obligations on impartiality.
If you don't remember Turkish President Erdogan's 2007 speech then this might remind you:
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told Turks living in Europe that they do not need to assimilate into their host societies. Erdogan was addressing an audience of 20,000 Turks gathered in Cologne on Sunday. The audience included Turks living in France, Belgian and the Netherlands, as well as in Germany.
"I understand very well that you are against assimilation. One cannot expect you to assimilate," Erdogan told the crowd.
He said, "Assimilation is a crime against humanity."
The Prime Minister did speak of the importance of integration but with conditions and for reasons. Erdogen told his audience that it is important to learn German, but that the Turkish language should not be disregarded. He highlighted the importance of education and that Turks in Europe should become more engaged in society, as well as aim to become more influential in politics. Taking the US as an example of a society where immigrant groups have always had substantial influence, Erdogan said that the five million Turks living in Europe should "be a constitutional element and not just guests."
Douglas Murray called that subversion. It certainly comes close to being so.
'"You're calling in to defend Corbyn and you can't even condemn Hamas an organisation that at its heart still has… a desire to wipe out all Jews from Israel.
"Not just oppose the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza - an organisation that still legitimises the random targeting of Israeli citizens including children in their schools."
He continued: "I'll tell you something if people supporting Corbyn and Labour can't even agree and accept that Hamas is a terrorist organisation then you are in the nasty party".'
Not the sort of words that you'd ever hear from a BBC radio host.
You can hear the whole of this Maajid Nawaz comment here http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/maajid-nawaz-destroys-caller-who-refuses-to-condem/
Jeremy Corbyn pictured enjoying pizza with controversial pro-Assad campaigner who denied genocide in Srebrenica
Do read The Telegraph article here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/11/jeremy-corbyn-pictured-enjoying-pizza-controversial-pro-assad/ it's not surprising but revealing about who Jeremy Corbyn chooses to associate with.
The Labour Party defence is most amusing:
'A Labour spokesman said: "Jeremy Corbyn had dinner with friends from Cypriots for Labour, during which they were joined briefly by Mr Papadopolous, who asked to be photographed with Jeremy.
"Photographs of Jeremy with members of the public do not mean he endorses their views, as is the case on this occasion too. '
Is that the best that they could come up with? At least Jeremy Corbyn didn't call this individual a friend but it is odd how many people that Jeremy Corbyn associates with are quite so unpleasant. Birds of a feather?
Tuesday, 11 July 2017
This video is interesting, let me see if I've got it right.
If Christians are anti LGBT then that prejudice needs to be confronted. An LGBT march would be a good thing.
A march through a majority Muslim area is, however, deemed a provocation. Why is this provocative? Is it because a majority of Muslims are not big fans of LGBT rights?
So why is confronting Christian prejudice a good thing but confronting Muslim prejudice provocative?
It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn. It's not 9/11 that will destroy the West, it's the West's pusilanimius reaction.
News that you won't find reported on by the BBC.
'An Islamic school that tried to suppress its critical Ofsted report can finally be named after a legal challenge by the Daily Mail.
Al-Hijrah School in Birmingham was criticised for segregating pupils and keeping books in its library that advocated beating wives.
Inspectors said the state-funded school needed to be put in special measures for issues including a breach of equality law.
But, in the first case of its kind, the school challenged Ofsted in the High Court, meaning the report is still being withheld from parents a year on from the inspection.
Judges ordered the name of the school be kept secret over fears of a 'media storm' – but following a challenge by the Daily Mail's parent company, Associated Newspapers Limited, the reporting restriction was lifted last night.
Ofsted's appeal against the school's High Court challenge, listed in the Court Of Appeal today, has serious implications for the watchdog's ability to give parents transparent information.
Sir Terence Etherton, the Master of the Rolls, ordered that the school could be named to preserve the principle of open justice.
He said: 'We have reached the clear decision on this application that we consider anonymity should be raised so that Associated Newspapers Limited will be able to name the school.'
Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, said: 'This is a victory for open justice. The Daily Mail has worked on behalf of the pupils, the parents and the people of Birmingham, to inform them what is happening. I am grateful to the paper for taking this battle up.'
More here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4683528/Islamic-school-tried-gag-Ofsted.html but definitely not on the BBC, where anything that shows British Muslims in a bad light must be hidden from the public.
Bill Still with yet another fascinating report that CNN, the BBC and the rest of the institutionally pro Democrats media won't touch with a bargepole.
'Downing Street has announced it's to hold a review of criminal and election law after reports of death threats, verbal abuse and intimidation.'
Maajid Nawaz has his opinions here http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/labour-is-the-new-nasty-party-under-jeremy-corbyn/
The institutionally pro Labour Party BBC has no interest in reporting anything negative about the Labour Party.
Election fraud allowed to take place in Muslim communities because of 'political correctness', report warns
' "Abuses of postal voting on demand were noted too often be carried out in communities where an individual's right to vote in secret and exercise free choice may not be fully valued. Evidence was presented of pressure being put on vulnerable members of some ethnic minority communities, particularly women and young people, to vote according to the will of the elders, especially in communities of Pakistani and Bangladeshi background.
"There were concerns that influence and intimidation within households may not be reported, and that state institutions had turned a blind eye to such behaviour because of 'politically correct' over-sensitivities about ethnicity and religion."
Sir Eric also calls for a ban on political activists handling postal ballots to stop "vote harvesting", when people offer to take people's ballots to the station for them but encourage them to back a particular candidate.
He also calls for individual postal votes to be reviewed every three years so that "absent voting" is no longer "institutionalised".'
You can read more about Eric Pickles' report from 2016 here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/11/election-fraud-allowed-to-take-place-in-muslim-communities-becau/
Did anything change as a result of this report? Did the BBC cover the report? Will matters get worse?
Monday, 10 July 2017
Odd how the police seem fine with this individual spouting anti Semitic hate speech on the streets of London.
After Metropolitan Police claims that it cannot answer CAA’s questions for “national security” reasons, Andrew Dismore lays their excuse bare per Campaign Against Antisemitism
'After the Metropolitan Police Service refused to answer questions from Campaign Against Antisemitism about the pro-pro-Hizballah "Al Quds Day" march, their flimsy attempt to hide their record from scrutiny has been laid bare.
The Metropolitan Police Service apparently does not consider allowing hundreds of supporters of terrorist group Hizballah to parade through our capital to be in any way prejudicial to "national security", but it was for "national security" reasons that the police force declined to answer questions from Campaign Against Antisemitism.
We began work to try to prevent the flying of the genocidal terrorist organisation's flag months ago. Metropolitan Police Service officers informally gave us conflicting accounts, telling us that nobody had been arrested at previous Al Quds marches, or that officers had gathered evidence at the marches and then made arrests later. We decided to find out exactly what had happened to people flying the flag of Hizballah, on the record.
On 26th April, our Scrutiny Unit filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, asking whether they arrested people at Al Quds Day marches in 2015 and 2016, and whether those arrests were related to terrorism charges
Despite the Freedom of Information Act requiring that the answer be provided within 20 working days, the Metropolitan Police Service waited until two days after the march, nearly a month late, to tell us that they refused to answer on various spurious grounds, including "national security" reasons. The police force also claimed that answering would "be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime [or] the apprehension or prosecution of offenders".
Whilst we appealed the decision to decline to answer our questions, we also asked London Assembly Member Andrew Dismore to put our questions to the Mayor of London. Whilst the Metropolitan Police Service spared no excuse in trying to avoid answering our questions, which would have meant telling us that in the past two years it has failed to arrest any of the Hizballah supporters marching through London, the Mayor of London was perfectly direct.
In written answers to Mr Dismore, the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan revealed that the Metropolitan Police Service made no arrests over flying the Hizballah flag during the "Al Quds Day" marches in 2015 and 2016, as we suspected.
It is extremely worrying that no arrests have been made for showing brazen support for an international terrorist group in the past two years, and it is outrageous that the Metropolitan Police Service has sought to conceal its record.'
Taken from the Campaign Against Antisemitism report here https://antisemitism.uk/after-metropolitan-police-claims-that-it-cannot-answer-caas-questions-for-national-security-reasons-andrew-dismore-lays-their-excuse-bare/
Sunday, 9 July 2017
Jeremy Corbyn and Brexit
"Antifa Cheers Speech Made Up Entirely From Hitler Quotes" - top trolling of people so stupid that they'd cheer almost anything that was said by someone purportedly on their side.
Craig at isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk is a tad optimistic in this piece http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/confessions-of-bbc-editor.html
'Still, if the penny genuinely has dropped with the Newsnight editor (as it appears to have done) that people's concerns about BBC bias do matter then that can only be a good thing.
And the acknowledgement that too manyNewsnight contributors come from "a relatively narrow band of opinion" (something we've been saying for ages) is very welcome.'
The trouble is that the BBC acknowledgment of previous bias extends to the Corbynista contingent not anyone vaguely right of the soggy centre. You can expect more extreme leftists being given airtime to spout their crap but not any for supporters of Brexit, fiscal continence or restrictions on unfettered immigration.
Thanks to http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/matt.html for the spot.